A Senate report revealed that Rice verbally agreed to allow torture methods to be used on captured suspects, and then lied about the extent to which she was involved. Rice played a central role in affirming the "legality" of the Bush administration's torture program. She was involved in the creation of the Bush administration's torture program
According to a mortality study by researchers at the University of Washington, Simon Fraser University and John Hopkins, approximately 500,000 died in Iraq as a direct or indirect result of the war.
Nearly 5,000 US and coalition forces were killed. The total body count, including soldiers, is nearly 188,000. The Iraq War directly caused over 120,000 civilians to die. But we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.
In an interview with CNN during the buildup to the war, Rice said the following, which made headlines around the world: The problem here is that there will always be some uncertainty about how quickly he can acquire nuclear weapons. if a larger type of warhead that Iraq has made and used in the past were filled with VX (an even deadlier nerve agent) and launched at a major city, it could kill up to one million people In January of 2003, Rice published an editorial in the New York Times entitled "Why We Know Iraq Is Lying". She was an integral part of the Bush administration's campaign of lies surrounding the war, working to further public support of the war by lying about Iraq's non-existent weapons of mass destruction. In fact, Condoleezza Rice was President Bush's National Security Advisor during the lead-up to the Iraq War, and was intimately involved in the decision to go to war with Iraq and spoke publicly in support of it. Many people mistakenly believe that Condoleezza Rice simply served as the Secretary of State and didn't have a role in the decision to go to war with Iraq. Why Condoleezza Rice should not hold power at Dropbox She helped start the Iraq War When a company quite literally has access to all of your data, ethics become more than a fun thought experiment. There is no doubt that Condoleezza Rice is an extremely brilliant and accomplished individual, having obtained her Masters degree at only age 20 (and a number of other impressive accomplishments).Ĭhoosing Condoleezza Rice for Dropbox's Board is problematic on a number of deeper levels, and invites serious concerns about Drew Houston and the senior leadership at Dropbox's commitment to freedom, openness, and ethics. It makes sense that Dropbox would want an accomplished, high-level, well-connected individual on their Board of Directors as they prepare for their IPO. Why is this? Because she was a part of the Bush administration? Because she is a Republican and we should hate Republicans? I mean, come on, isn't Al Gore on Apple's Board? He's no saint! This is deeply disturbing, and anyone - or any business - who values ethics should be concerned. We’re honored to be adding someone as brilliant and accomplished as Dr. Rice has had an illustrious career as Provost of Stanford University, board member of companies like Hewlett Packard and Charles Schwab, and former United States Secretary of State. When looking to grow our board, we sought out a leader who could help us expand our global footprint. Condoleezza Rice to our Board of Directors. Dropbox's CEO, Drew Houston, posted the following message. On April 9th, 2014, Dropbox announced that Condoleezza Rice will be joining their Board of Directors.